Multiple Sclerosis Resource Centre
  • Home
  • World MS Day (Green Day)
  • About MS
  • MSRC Services
  • Get Involved
  • MS Research News
  • MSRC Groups
  • Useful Resources
  • Advertising
  • MSRC Guest Book
  • Best Bet Diet Group
  • E-Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • Investor in People
    You are here : Home » The Best Bet Diet Group » Online Newsletter » Past Newsletter Articles » BBD Science and Research Articles » Article 49: Vitamin D - A Rat Poison Safer than Wa

    Article 49: Vitamin D - A Rat Poison Safer than Water

    A A A
    [Print this page]

    Share |


    This is a periodic newsletter from the Vitamin D Council, a non-profit trying to end the epidemic of vitamin D deficiency

    Another Vitamin D Quiz


    This month we have a ten question quiz on the latest vitamin D research. Here's a primer.

    Question:     Name a rat poison crucial to health and safer than water. 

    Answer:        Vitamin D

    Yes, cholecalciferol is a rat poison. Rodenticide and Rodenticides

    If it's a rat poison, why did Professor Heaney just recommend up to 4,000 units every day? Click here.

    The answer is dosage.  To demonstrate the point, I recently swallowed an entire bottle (100 capsules) of vitamin D (40,000 units) in front of a skeptical audience to convince them that vitamin D is safer than water. Here's why.  Eight glasses of water a day is fine for healthy adults. Ten times that amount, eighty glasses of water, will make you sick from water intoxication.  

    Humans need about 4,000 units of vitamin D a day (from all sources). Ten times that amount, 40,000 units, is very safe in a single dose, as I demonstrated to the audience.  Therefore, vitamin D has a safer therapeutic index than water.  

    (Taking the entire bottle certainly got the audience's attention.  I think they were paying close attention to see if I would drop dead.  By the way, if you were to take 40,000 units every day for months you would get vitamin D toxicity, after years of such doses you would probably die.  After taking 40,000 units at one time - equivalent to two days at the beach - I simply stayed out of the sun for several days.) 

    A rat poison safer than water - but why do we need vitamin D?  Within the last several months, scientists published impressive new evidence that vitamin D is involved in a staggering array of diseases: age related cognitive decline, heart disease, breast cancer, tuberculosis, Parkinson's disease, prostate cancer, chronic pain, fractured hips, premenstrual syndrome and diabetes.   



    Good time for another quiz. 


    1.   Vitamin D reverses inflammatory changes associated with age-related memory impairment.
     
    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  Researchers from Ireland were the first to demonstrate that vitamin D3 acts as an anti-inflammatory agent and turns old brains into young brains - at least as far as inflammatory cytokines are concerned. This research suggests vitamin D may prevent, or even treat, age-related cognitive decline! Click here.


    2.      Your blood sugar is closely associated with your vitamin D level.

    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  Researchers in Australia added to the growing evidence that sun avoidance may have caused the epidemic of type 2 diabetes.  The Australians' findings were straightforward and powerful.  The higher your vitamin D level, the lower your blood glucose. Click here.



    3.    In July, a group from Minnesota found that 100% of elderly patients admitted for fragility fractures were vitamin D deficient despite the fact that half of them were taking vitamin D supplements.

    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  The authors found that women taking supplemental vitamin D had average levels of 16.4 ng/ml while women not taking supplements had levels of 11.9.ng/ml, both dangerously low.  None of the 82 women got enough sun or took enough vitamin D to obtain a level of 40 ng/ml. These were fragility fractures, not fractures caused by unusual trauma. That is, their bones just sort of fell apart. Click here.



    4.   Women with the lowest vitamin D levels had five times higher risk for breast cancer.

    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  Women with 25(OH)-vitamin D blood levels less than 20 ng/ml were more than five times more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer than were women with levels above 60 ng/ml.  That is five, repeat five, times less likely! Click here.



    5.     Avoiding the sun doubles the risk of prostate cancer.   

    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  Again, the risk of avoiding the sun is clear, this time in another study with prostate cancer.  However, the authors pointed out that sun exposure increases the risk of skin cancer and believed that proper vitamin D supplementation "may be the safest solution to achieve an adequate vitamin D status." Click here.

    I also believe supplementation is the only way to go for many people. African Americans are simply unable spend adequate time in the sun.  In addition, the sun ages the skin and that fact alone will keep many Americans out of the sun.  That said, I go into the sun whenever I can. The reason is simple: it is the most conservative thing to do.  Until we know everything the sun does - and it does more than just make vitamin D - the conservative approach is to mimic our ancestors and the environment in which human evolved, whenever we can.  Therefore, it makes sense to sunbathe sensibly in the late spring, summer, and early fall and take supplements or use UVB lamps the rest of the time. Click here


    6.   South Korean researchers associated vitamin D deficiency with Parkinson's Disease.  

    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  Actually, they showed that certain genetic malformations (VDR polymorphisms) are more likely in-patients with Parkinson's Disease, implying an association with vitamin D and Parkinsonism.  Click here.



    7.      Researchers in England discovered that patients with chronic pain have phenomenally low vitamin D levels.

    a)     True

    b)     False

    True.  The authors added to the evidence that severe vitamin D deficiency is associated with chronic pain.  They found that 88% of their patients with chronic pain had levels less than 10 ng/ml.  If they treated their patients, they did not report it.  However, Swiss researchers recently treated chronic pain patients with vitamin D and
    reported the pain "disappeared" within one to three months in most of their patients.  This is the second open study that showed adequate doses of vitamin D dramatically improve chronic pain. Click here.

    Ann Rheum Dis. 2005
    Aug;64(8):1217-9. Click here

     BMJ. 2004 Jul
    17;329(7458):156-7.Click here

    Spine. 2003 Jan
    15;28(2):177-9.Click here.



    8.  (a)    Severe vitamin D deficiency is common in TB patients.  

    (b) Some English doctors don't the difference between ideal and "normal"
    levels.
      

    (c) Most American doctors don't know the difference either.

    a)     All are true

    b)     All are false

    c)  Some are true and some are false

    All are true.  First, the authors reviewed the impressive animal evidence that vitamin D can help treat TB.  Then they reported that most of their immigrant TB patients had undetectable vitamin D levels.  Then they reported the normal range for their lab was between 5 to 47 ng/ml but "normal" was any level greater than 9 ng/ml.  Finally, the
    researchers reported they treated their patients with "normal daily doses" of vitamin D, without reporting how much they gave.  Apparently, they gave just enough to get patients above 9 ng/ml.  Click here

    Keep in mind that different laboratory technique result in different ranges for 25(OH)-vitamin D levels.  Now matter what technique is used, ideal levels can roughly be defined as any level above the median.  In this case, as you will see below in Dr. Heaney's article, the doctors should have treated their patients with 4,000 units a day.  They should also watch for evidence of vitamin D hypersensitivity, which can occur
    when treating tuberculosis patients for vitamin D deficiency.

    We can only mourn for the poor immigrants who have to suffer from both TB and vitamin D deficiency.  Of course, few physicians in the USA know the difference between the Gaussian definition of "normal" (average ranges for the population tested) and the ideal definition of "normal" (levels above 32 ng/ml).  Getting commercial reference labs to report ideal 25(OH)-vitamin D levels should be a priority of everyone involved in trying to end the epidemic of vitamin D deficiency. 



    9.   (a) Virtually all nephrologists give renal failure patients a vitamin D-like drug.

    (b) Virtually all renal failure patients are severely vitamin D deficient.

    (c) Some nephrologists know the difference between vitamin D and calcitriol.


    a)     All are true

    b)     All are false

    c)      Some are true and some are false.

    All are true.  Finally, the truth about renal failure patients: most of them are vitamin D deficient despite taking vitamin D analogs!  Most nephrologists prescribe activated vitamin D (calcitriol) or vitamin D analogs but not vitamin D.  Calcitriol and vitamin D analogs do nothing to prevent vitamin D deficiency.  Renal failure patients need both
    vitamin D and a calcitriol-like drug.  Moreover, 400 units a day of vitamin D will not correct their deficiencies.  As you will see below, they need up to 4,000.Click here
     
    P.S.  If you think nephrologists know the difference between vitamin D and calcitriol, read this months paper from some nephrologists at the University of Texas.  They discuss the importance of vitamin D in preventing and treating heart disease.  (I think adequate vitamin D nutrition may prevent more cardiovascular deaths than cancer deaths.) However, I read the Texas paper three times and still don't know if the
    authors know the difference between vitamin D and calcitriol.  I hope they know the difference between cholesterol and testosterone.  (Some cholesterol is metabolized into steroid hormones, vitamin D is a prehormone; testosterone is a steroid hormone, calcitriol is the most potent steroid hormone in the human body).Click here



    10. Professor Robert Heaney proved, again, that he is a gentleman and a
    scholar.

    a)  True

    b)  False

    True.  In the most important clinical paper published this month, Heaney gave the three best reasons why we should all maintain minimum levels of at least 32 ng/ml, the level that: 

    (a)   effectively suppresses PTH,

    (b)   maximizes calcium absorption,

    (c)   maximally improves glucose tolerance


    Then he goes on to show that some of us, especially African Americans, will need to take 3,000 to 4,000 units every day to maintain healthy 25(OH)-vitamin D blood levels. Click here.


    He then defends the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) recommendation that we only take one-tenth that amount as the best science that was available in 1997.  I admire Dr. Heaney for trying to cover for the IOM.  The truth is that both Dr. Heaney and Dr. Holick told the IOM that 2,000 units a day was not toxic and would prevent both adequate treatment and meaningful research.  The IOM then proceeded to ignore the only two vitamin D experts on the panel.

    Writing two years later, Professor Reinhold Vieth came up with dozens of studies the IOM overlooked.  These studies conclusively showed 2,000 units a day could not be toxic.  Furthermore, Vieth found the literature published before 1997 clearly showed 10,000 units a day was unlikely to be toxic.  Vitamin D toxicity probably starts around 20,000 units a day, and then only if taken for months or even years. Click here.



    Imagine.  A rat poison safer than water and crucial to health. 


    John Cannell, MD
    9100 San Gregorio Road
    Atascadero, CA 93422

    The Vitamin D Council  Click here.

    Related Items
    Article 01: Theory Attacks MS Diagnosis
    Article 02: Ponsenby et al UVB Review
    Article 03: Celtic Gene - Link to MS
    Article 04: MS in the Canaries
    Article 05 Two Phases of MS
    Article 06: Infants Should Be Supplemented with Vitamin D says EU Committee
    Article 07: Cytokine Profile in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Following Vitamin D Supplementation
    Article 08: Starvation May Help MS
    Article 09: Ginko Biloba
    Article 10: CLA Reduces Leptin Levels
    Article 11: Doctors Seek Better Treatments for MS
    Article 12: RA and Mediteranian Diet
    Article 13: Mediteranian Diet and RA (Paper 2)
    Article 14: Vit D in Preventative Medicine - Are we Ignoring the Evidence?
    Article 15: Interferon Treatment of MS Questioned
    Article 16: MS in African/American Women
    Article 17: Mercury in Fish
    Article 18: Can Vitamin D impact MS?
    Article 19: Tip the Scales in Favor of Fish
    Article 20: Does Mercury Matter?
    Article 21: Skin Exposure in Childhood and risk of MS
    Article 22: Iron Deficient Mice Resistant to E.A.E.
    Article 23: High dose antioxidant supplementation to MS patients. Effects on glutathione peroxidase, clinical safety, and absorption of selenium
    Article 24: Vitamin D Supplementation in the Fight Against MS
    Article 25: 40% Reduction in MS Incidence with Vit D Supplementation
    Article 26: Long latency Vit D Deficiency - Robert P.Heaney
    Article 27: Antibody Cross-Reactivity between Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein and the Milk Protein Butyrophilin in Multiple Sclerosis
    Article 28: Skin Cancer in PwMS
    Article 29: Vitamin D Supplementation During Lactation and Pregnancy
    Article 30: Gluten Antibodies and MS
    Article 31:Glycemic index in chronic disease: a review
    Article 32: Timing of birth and risk of multiple sclerosis: population based study
    Article 33:Randomized comparison of the effects of the vitamin D3 adequate intake versus 100 mcg (4000 IU) per day on biochemical responses and the wellbeing of patients.
    Article 34: Multiple sclerosis and vitamin D: an update
    Article 35: Discovery Could Lead to Prevention/Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases
    Article 36: Tanning is associated with optimal vitamin D status (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration) and higher bone mineral density.
    Article 37: Early effects of gliadin on enterocyte intracellular signalling involved in intestinal barrier function
    Article 38:Sunlight Prevents Cancer
    Article 39: Assay Variation Confounds the Diagnosis of
    Article 40: Coconut Oil by James South
    Article 41: Scientists say Sunshine May Prevent Cancer
    Article 42: A Vegan Diet changes Intestinal Flora
    Article 43: Ready-to-eat spinach bears tough microbes
    Article 44:UVR, Vitamin D and Three Autoimmune Diseases
    Article 45: Vitamin D Deficiency and Bone Mineral Density
    Article 46: Serum ferritin, transferrin and soluble transferrin receptor levels in multiple sclerosis patients
    Article 47: Omega-3 Fatty Impacts Health and Disease
    Article 48: The Multiple Factors of Multiple Sclerosis: A Darwinian Perspective.
    Article 50: Randomized comparison of the effects of the vitamin D3 adequate intake versus 100 mcg (4000 IU) per day on biochemical responses and the wellbeing of patients.
    Article 51: A phase I dose escalation study of vitamin D3 with calcium supplementation in patients with multiple sclerosis
    Article 52: First Course; Vitamin D, As in Our Daily Deficiency
    Article 53: Sunlight, Vitamin D and Health - Ian Gibson, MP - Invitation
    Article 54: The truth about soya
    Article 55: Glucosamine and Autoimmunity
    Article 57: Diets with a high glycemic load increase the risk of a myocardial infarction


    Did you find this information useful? Would you like to comment on this page? Let us know what you think! We welcome all comments and feedback on any aspect of our website - please click here to contact us.